| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Belmondo '92 · 4r compared , 7 excl. → Full breakdown | 10–1 | 3–1 | 3 0 |
| Heinz-Harald Frentzen '94–'95 · 3r compared , 7 excl. → Full breakdown | 0–9 | 1–2 | 4 5 |
| JJ Lehto '93 · 2r compared , 14 excl. → Full breakdown | 8–8 | 2–0 | 7 5 |
| Maurício Gugelmin '91 · 1r compared , 1 excl. → Full breakdown | 0–2 | 0–1 | 0 0 |
| Emanuele Naspetti '92 · 1r compared , 2 excl. → Full breakdown | 3–0 | 1–0 | 0 0 |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.