| Season | Team | ENT | R | Win | Pod | Pole | Pts | WDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Sauber | 16 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | P13 |
| 1995 | Sauber | 17 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 | P9 |
| 1996 | Sauber | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | P12 |
| 1997 | Williams | 17 | 17 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 42 | P2 |
| 1998 | Williams | 16 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 17 | P7 |
| 1999 | Jordan | 16 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 54 | P3 |
| 2000 | Jordan | 17 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11 | P9 |
| 2001 | Jordan + Prost | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | P13 |
| 2002 | Arrows + Sauber | 13 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | P18 |
| 2003 | Sauber | 16 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | P11 |
| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jacques Villeneuve '97–'98 · 16r compared , 17 excl. → Full breakdown | 10–23 | 7–9 | 59 102 |
| Jarno Trulli '00–'01 · 7r compared , 20 excl. → Full breakdown | 9–18 | 4–3 | 17 15 |
| Nick Heidfeld '02–'03 · 7r compared , 10 excl. → Full breakdown | 7–10 | 3–4 | 13 6 |
| Jean-Christophe Boullion '95 · 5r compared , 6 excl. → Full breakdown | 11–0 | 5–0 | 12 3 |
| Damon Hill '99 · 5r compared , 11 excl. → Full breakdown | 13–2 | 5–0 | 54 7 |
| Karl Wendlinger '94–'95 · 3r compared , 7 excl. → Full breakdown | 9–0 | 2–1 | 5 4 |
| Johnny Herbert '96 · 3r compared , 13 excl. → Full breakdown | 13–3 | 3–0 | 7 4 |
| Enrique Bernoldi '02 · 2r compared , 10 excl. → Full breakdown | 11–1 | 1–1 | 2 0 |
| Andrea de Cesaris '94 · 1r compared , 8 excl. → Full breakdown | 8–1 | 1–0 | 4 1 |
| JJ Lehto '94 · 1r compared , 1 excl. → Full breakdown | 2–0 | 1–0 | 1 0 |
| Tomáš Enge '01 · 1r compared , 2 excl. → Full breakdown | 3–0 | 1–0 | 0 0 |
| Luciano Burti '01 · 0r compared , 2 excl. | 2–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.