| Season | Team | ENT | R | Win | Pod | Pole | Pts | WDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Williams | 8 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | P8 |
| 1995 | Williams | 17 | 17 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 49 | P3 |
| 1996 | McLaren | 16 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 18 | P7 |
| 1997 | McLaren | 17 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 36 | P3 |
| 1998 | McLaren | 16 | 16 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 56 | P3 |
| 1999 | McLaren | 16 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 48 | P4 |
| 2000 | McLaren | 17 | 17 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 73 | P3 |
| 2001 | McLaren | 17 | 17 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 65 | P2 |
| 2002 | McLaren | 17 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 41 | P5 |
| 2003 | McLaren | 16 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 51 | P7 |
| 2004 | McLaren | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | P10 |
| 2005 | Red Bull | 19 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | P12 |
| 2006 | Red Bull | 18 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | P13 |
| 2007 | Red Bull | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | P10 |
| 2008 | Red Bull | 18 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | P16 |
| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mika Häkkinen '96–'01 · 45r compared , 54 excl. → Full breakdown | 31–68 | 18–27 | 296 360 |
| Kimi Räikkönen '02–'04 · 21r compared , 30 excl. → Full breakdown | 19–32 | 4–17 | 116 160 |
| Christian Klien '05–'06 · 17r compared , 13 excl. → Full breakdown | 16–14 | 10–7 | 32 11 |
| Mark Webber '07–'08 · 15r compared , 20 excl. → Full breakdown | 4–31 | 3–12 | 22 31 |
| Damon Hill '94–'95 · 9r compared , 16 excl. → Full breakdown | 8–17 | 2–7 | 63 131 |
| Vitantonio Liuzzi '05 · 2r compared , 2 excl. → Full breakdown | 4–0 | 1–1 | 6 1 |
| Robert Doornbos '06 · 1r compared , 2 excl. → Full breakdown | 1–2 | 1–0 | 0 0 |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.