| Season | Team | ENT | R | Win | Pod | Pole | Pts | WDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1983 | Arrows | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1984 | Arrows | 16 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | P15 |
| 1985 | Arrows | 16 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | P11 |
| 1986 | Arrows | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1987 | Benetton | 16 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16 | P8 |
| 1988 | Benetton | 16 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 27 | P4 |
| 1989 | Williams | 16 | 16 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 37 | P5 |
| 1990 | Williams | 16 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 34 | P6 |
| 1991 | Ligier | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1992 | Ligier | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | P14 |
| 1993 | Jordan | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riccardo Patrese '89–'90 · 13r compared , 19 excl. → Full breakdown | 12–20 | 9–4 | 71 63 |
| Marc Surer '83–'86 · 9r compared , 22 excl. → Full breakdown | 20–11 | 7–2 | 5 1 |
| Érik Comas '91–'92 · 9r compared , 23 excl. → Full breakdown | 22–9 | 2–7 | 2 4 |
| Alessandro Nannini '88 · 6r compared , 10 excl. → Full breakdown | 8–8 | 4–2 | 27 12 |
| Gerhard Berger '85 · 5r compared , 11 excl. → Full breakdown | 12–4 | 4–1 | 11 3 |
| Christian Danner '86 · 3r compared , 7 excl. → Full breakdown | 6–4 | 3–0 | 0 1 |
| Teo Fabi '87 · 3r compared , 13 excl. → Full breakdown | 13–3 | 1–2 | 16 12 |
| Rubens Barrichello '93 · 2r compared , 8 excl. → Full breakdown | 0–10 | 1–1 | 0 0 |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.