| Season | Team | ENT | R | Win | Pod | Pole | Pts | WDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Minardi | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1997 | Jordan | 17 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 20 | P8 |
| 1998 | Benetton | 16 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 16 | P9 |
| 1999 | Benetton | 16 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | P9 |
| 2000 | Benetton | 17 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 18 | P6 |
| 2001 | Benetton | 17 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | P11 |
| 2002 | Jordan | 17 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | P11 |
| 2003 | Jordan | 16 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12 | P12 |
| 2004 | Sauber | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | P11 |
| 2005 | Renault | 19 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 58 | P5 |
| 2006 | Renault | 18 | 18 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 72 | P4 |
| 2007 | Renault | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | P8 |
| 2008 | Force India | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P19 |
| 2009 | Force India | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | P15 |
| Ferrari | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Alonso '05–'06 | 11–26 | 5–23 | 130 267 | → |
| Alexander Wurz '98–'00 | 36–13 | 14–10 | 47 22 | → |
| Heikki Kovalainen '07 | 8–9 | 5–9 | 21 30 | → |
| Adrian Sutil '08–'09 | 16–14 | 8–6 | 8 0 | → |
| Felipe Massa '04 | 11–7 | 10–3 | 22 12 | → |
| Jenson Button '01 | 13–4 | 8–1 | 8 2 | → |
| Ralf Schumacher '97 | 10–7 | 2–3 | 20 13 | → |
| Takuma Sato '02 | 11–4 | 4–1 | 7 2 | → |
| Kimi Räikkönen '09 | 0–5 | 0–5 | 0 14 | → |
| Ralph Firman '03 | 12–2 | 1–1 | 12 1 | → |
| Pedro Lamy '96 | 6–2 | 0–1 | 0 0 | → |
| Zsolt Baumgartner '03 | 2–0 | 1–0 | 0 0 | → |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.