| Season | Team | ENT | R | Win | Pod | Pole | Pts | WDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Williams | 16 | 16 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 78 | P2 |
| 1997 | Williams | 17 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 81 | P1 |
| 1998 | Williams | 16 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 21 | P5 |
| 1999 | BAR | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000 | BAR | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | P7 |
| 2001 | BAR | 17 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 12 | P7 |
| 2002 | BAR | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | P12 |
| 2003 | BAR | 15 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | P16 |
| 2004 | Renault | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P21 |
| 2005 | Sauber | 19 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | P14 |
| 2006 | BMW Sauber | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | P15 |
| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heinz-Harald Frentzen '97–'98 · 16r compared , 17 excl. → Full breakdown | 23–10 | 9–7 | 102 59 |
| Felipe Massa '05 · 12r compared , 7 excl. → Full breakdown | 6–13 | 3–9 | 9 11 |
| Olivier Panis '01–'02 · 11r compared , 23 excl. → Full breakdown | 21–13 | 7–4 | 16 8 |
| Damon Hill '96 · 9r compared , 7 excl. → Full breakdown | 3–13 | 4–5 | 78 97 |
| Ricardo Zonta '99–'00 · 7r compared , 23 excl. → Full breakdown | 26–3 | 7–0 | 17 3 |
| Nick Heidfeld '06 · 7r compared , 5 excl. → Full breakdown | 7–5 | 2–5 | 7 13 |
| Jenson Button '03 · 4r compared , 11 excl. → Full breakdown | 6–8 | 1–3 | 6 12 |
| Fernando Alonso '04 · 3r compared → Full breakdown | 1–2 | 0–3 | 0 14 |
| Mika Salo '99 · 0r compared , 3 excl. | 3–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.