| Season | Team | ENT | R | Win | Pod | Pole | Pts | WDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Prost | 17 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P20 |
| 2001 | Sauber | 17 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | P8 |
| 2002 | Sauber | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | P10 |
| 2003 | Sauber | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | P14 |
| 2004 | Jordan | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | P18 |
| 2005 | Williams | 14 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 28 | P11 |
| 2006 | BMW Sauber | 18 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 23 | P9 |
| 2007 | BMW Sauber | 17 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 61 | P5 |
| 2008 | BMW Sauber | 18 | 18 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 60 | P6 |
| 2009 | BMW Sauber | 17 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 19 | P13 |
| 2010 | Sauber | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | P18 |
| 2011 | Renault | 11 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 34 | P11 |
| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Kubica '06–'09 | 28–29 | 21–24 | 150 137 | → |
| Felipe Massa '02 | 11–5 | 4–4 | 7 4 | → |
| Heinz-Harald Frentzen '02–'03 | 10–7 | 5–3 | 6 13 | → |
| Kimi Räikkönen '01 | 10–7 | 4–3 | 12 9 | → |
| Jacques Villeneuve '06 | 5–7 | 5–2 | 13 7 | → |
| Vitaly Petrov '11 | 3–7 | 5–2 | 34 32 | → |
| Mark Webber '05 | 5–9 | 3–3 | 28 24 | → |
| Kamui Kobayashi '10 | 1–4 | 1–3 | 6 11 | → |
| Giorgio Pantano '04 | 11–3 | 3–0 | 2 0 | → |
| Timo Glock '04 | 4–0 | 2–1 | 1 2 | → |
| Jean Alesi '00 | 7–9 | 1–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Sebastian Vettel '07 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 1 | → |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.