| Season | Team | ENT | R | Win | Pod | Pole | Pts | WDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Prost | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | P15 |
| Minardi | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1998 | Prost | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | P17 |
| 1999 | Prost | 16 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | P11 |
| 2000 | Jordan | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | P10 |
| 2001 | Jordan | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | P9 |
| 2002 | Renault | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | P8 |
| 2003 | Renault | 16 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33 | P8 |
| 2004 | Renault | 15 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 46 | P6 |
| Toyota | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2005 | Toyota | 19 | 18 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 43 | P7 |
| 2006 | Toyota | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | P12 |
| 2007 | Toyota | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | P13 |
| 2008 | Toyota | 18 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 31 | P9 |
| 2009 | Toyota | 17 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 32.5 | P8 |
| 2010 | Lotus Racing | 19 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P21 |
| 2011 | Lotus Racing | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P21 |
| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ralf Schumacher '05–'07 | 36–17 | 16–15 | 66 70 | → |
| Timo Glock '08–'09 | 25–7 | 11–12 | 61.5 49 | → |
| Heikki Kovalainen '10–'11 | 13–24 | 4–14 | 0 0 | → |
| Fernando Alonso '03–'04 | 16–15 | 6–9 | 79 100 | → |
| Olivier Panis '98–'04 | 18–15 | 10–1 | 8 2 | → |
| Heinz-Harald Frentzen '00–'01 | 18–9 | 5–4 | 15 17 | → |
| Jenson Button '02 | 12–5 | 4–2 | 9 14 | → |
| Shinji Nakano '97 | 6–1 | 3–1 | 3 1 | → |
| Ricardo Zonta '01–'05 | 4–0 | 1–1 | 0 0 | → |
| Ukyo Katayama '97 | 6–1 | 1–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Jean Alesi '01 | 4–1 | 1–0 | 3 1 | → |
| Kamui Kobayashi '09 | 2–0 | 0–1 | 2 3 | → |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.