PIQ

Nelson Piquet

1978–1991
203
Starts
23
Wins
60
Podiums
24
Poles
3
Titles
485.5
Points

Season by season

tap a header to sort
Season Team ENT R Win Pod Pole Pts WDC
1978 McLaren 3 3 0 0 0 0
Ensign 1 1 0 0 0 0
Brabham 1 1 0 0 0 0
1979 Brabham 15 15 0 0 0 3 P15
1980 Brabham 14 14 3 6 2 54 P2
1981 Brabham 15 15 3 7 4 50 P1
1982 Brabham 15 14 1 2 1 20 P11
1983 Brabham 15 15 3 8 1 59 P1
1984 Brabham 16 16 2 4 9 29 P5
1985 Brabham 16 15 1 2 1 21 P8
1986 Williams 16 16 4 10 2 69 P3
1987 Williams 16 15 3 11 4 76 P1
1988 Lotus 16 16 0 3 0 22 P6
1989 Lotus 16 15 0 0 0 12 P8
1990 Benetton 16 16 2 4 0 44 P3
1991 Benetton 16 16 1 3 0 26.5 P6

Teammates, head to head

most races first · default: both classified
Teammate Qualifying Race Points
Nigel Mansell '86–'87 13–18 8–10 145 133
Alessandro Nannini '90 9–5 5–3 26 21
Satoru Nakajima '88–'89 28–4 6–1 34 4
Héctor Rebaque '80–'81 22–0 6–0 79 12
Riccardo Patrese '82–'87 20–11 4–2 79 34
Marc Surer '85 11–1 6–0 21 5
Roberto Moreno '90–'91 10–3 4–0 40 14
Michael Schumacher '91 1–4 1–2 4.5 4
Ricardo Zunino '79–'80 9–0 2–0 25 0
Teo Fabi '84 12–0 2–0 19 9
Patrick Tambay '78 0–3 0–1 0 2
Bruno Giacomelli '78 0–2 1–0 0 0
Niki Lauda '78–'79 6–8 0–1 3 4
Manfred Winkelhock '84 1–0 1–0 1 0
Harald Ertl '78 1–0 0–0 0 0
Brett Lunger '78 0–3 0–0 0 0
James Hunt '78 0–3 0–0 0 0
John Watson '78 0–1 0–0 0 0
Corrado Fabi '84 2–1 0–0 9 0
François Hesnault '85 4–0 0–0 0 0

Compare with any driver

career records side by side · any era

Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.

Reliability & consistency

era-dependent · see explanation
37.9% DNF rate 77 in 203 starts
49.3% points-finish rate 100 in 203 starts
P1 best finish
P1 best grid
DNF rate & points-finish rate

DNF rate — "how often did they not finish?"

The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.

Points-finish rate — "how often did they score?"

The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.