| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Brabham '64–'67 · 6r compared , 19 excl. → Full breakdown | 1–24 | 2–4 | 8 71 |
| Denny Hulme '65–'67 · 5r compared , 12 excl. → Full breakdown | 1–16 | 0–5 | 3 47 |
| Jo Bonnier '64–'66 · 4r compared , 11 excl. → Full breakdown | 5–10 | 3–1 | 5 1 |
| Jo Siffert '64–'66 · 4r compared , 11 excl. → Full breakdown | 7–8 | 2–2 | 5 5 |
| Dan Gurney '64–'65 · 3r compared , 11 excl. → Full breakdown | 0–14 | 1–2 | 5 19 |
| Chris Amon '63–'66 · 1r compared , 3 excl. → Full breakdown | 2–2 | 0–1 | 1 0 |
| John Campbell-Jones '63 · 1r compared → Full breakdown | 1–0 | 1–0 | 0 0 |
| Mike Hailwood '63 · 1r compared → Full breakdown | 0–1 | 0–1 | 0 0 |
| John Taylor '66 · 1r compared , 3 excl. → Full breakdown | 4–0 | 0–1 | 0 1 |
| Ian Raby '64–'65 · 0r compared , 4 excl. | 4–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| Frank Gardner '64–'65 · 0r compared , 7 excl. | 4–3 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| Jochen Rindt '64 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 0–1 | 0–0 | 4 0 |
| Giacomo Russo '64 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| Paul Hawkins '65 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| David Prophet '65 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| Chris Irwin '66 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| Hans Herrmann '66 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| Alan Rees '66 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| Kurt Ahrens, Jr. '66 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| Silvio Moser '66 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
| Dave Charlton '67 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 0–1 | 0–0 | 2 0 |
| Luki Botha '67 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 2 0 |
| Guy Ligier '67 · 0r compared , 1 excl. | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.