| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denny Hulme '74 | 7–4 | 2–4 | 12 12 | → |
| Emerson Fittipaldi '74 | 1–10 | 2–4 | 12 37 | → |
| Jim Clark '63–'64 | 0–11 | 0–4 | 1 32 | → |
| Peter Arundell '64 | 0–3 | 0–3 | 1 11 | → |
| Carlos Pace '73 | 8–7 | 1–2 | 0 7 | → |
| Chris Amon '63–'64 | 2–7 | 1–1 | 1 2 | → |
| Andrea de Adamich '72–'73 | 10–1 | 2–0 | 13 3 | → |
| Tim Schenken '72 | 6–4 | 2–0 | 13 0 | → |
| Jim Hall '63 | 0–1 | 0–1 | 0 1 | → |
| Masten Gregory '63 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Jo Siffert '63–'64 | 1–1 | 1–0 | 1 0 | → |
| Bob Anderson '63 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Mike Spence '64 | 2–5 | 0–1 | 0 4 | → |
| Walt Hansgen '64 | 1–0 | 0–1 | 0 2 | → |
| John Surtees '71–'72 | 2–2 | 1–0 | 9 0 | → |
| Sam Posey '71–'72 | 2–0 | 0–1 | 0 0 | → |
| Jochen Mass '73 | 2–1 | 0–1 | 0 0 | → |
| Dave Charlton '74 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 4 0 | → |
| Trevor Taylor '63–'64 | 1–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Peter Revson '64 | 5–0 | 0–0 | 1 0 | → |
| Bernard Collomb '64 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 1 0 | |
| Innes Ireland '64 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 1 0 | |
| Gerhard Mitter '64 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Moisés Solana '64 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Paul Hawkins '65 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Richard Attwood '65 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Rolf Stommelen '71 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 3 0 | |
| Gijs van Lennep '71 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| John Love '72 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Luiz Bueno '73 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.