RIN

Jochen Rindt

1964–1970
60
Starts
6
Wins
13
Podiums
10
Poles
1
Titles
109
Points

Season by season

tap a header to sort
Season Team ENT R Win Pod Pole Pts WDC
1964 Brabham 1 1 0 0 0 0
1965 Cooper 10 9 0 0 0 4 P13
1966 Cooper 9 9 0 3 0 24 P3
1967 Cooper 10 10 0 0 0 6 P12
1968 Brabham 12 12 0 2 2 8 P12
1969 Lotus 10 10 1 3 5 22 P4
1970 Lotus 10 9 5 5 3 45 P1

Teammates, head to head

most races first
Teammate Qualifying Race Points
Graham Hill '69–'70 · 4r compared , 14 excl. → Full breakdown 18–0 4–0 67 17
Jo Siffert '64–'69 · 3r compared , 25 excl. → Full breakdown 25–3 3–0 48 20
John Miles '69–'70 · 3r compared , 12 excl. → Full breakdown 15–0 3–0 58 2
Bruce McLaren '65 · 2r compared , 8 excl. → Full breakdown 2–8 0–2 4 10
Guy Ligier '66–'67 · 2r compared , 6 excl. → Full breakdown 8–0 2–0 18 0
John Surtees '66 · 2r compared , 5 excl. → Full breakdown 1–6 1–1 18 19
Emerson Fittipaldi '70 · 2r compared , 2 excl. → Full breakdown 4–0 2–0 18 3
Jack Brabham '64–'68 · 1r compared , 12 excl. → Full breakdown 11–2 1–0 8 2
John Love '65–'70 · 1r compared , 4 excl. → Full breakdown 4–1 1–0 4 6
Richie Ginther '66 · 1r compared , 1 excl. → Full breakdown 2–0 1–0 6 2
Chris Amon '66 · 1r compared → Full breakdown 1–0 1–0 3 0
Chris Lawrence '66 · 1r compared , 1 excl. → Full breakdown 2–0 1–0 6 0
Jacky Ickx '67 · 1r compared , 1 excl. → Full breakdown 2–0 1–0 3 1
Kurt Ahrens, Jr. '68 · 1r compared → Full breakdown 1–0 1–0 4 0
Pete Lovely '69–'70 · 1r compared , 5 excl. → Full breakdown 6–0 1–0 40 0
Bob Anderson '64 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 4
Jo Bonnier '64–'69 · 0r compared , 17 excl. 16–1 0–0 28 5
Dan Gurney '64–'68 · 0r compared , 2 excl. 1–1 0–0 0 0
Trevor Blokdyk '65 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
John Rhodes '65 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Alan Rollinson '65 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Moisés Solana '66 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Pedro Rodríguez '67 · 0r compared , 7 excl. → Full breakdown 6–1 0–0 3 14
Alan Rees '67 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Silvio Moser '67–'68 · 0r compared , 6 excl. 6–0 0–0 4 2
Richard Attwood '67 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Tom Jones '67 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Jackie Pretorius '68 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 4 0
Dave Charlton '68–'70 · 0r compared , 2 excl. → Full breakdown 2–0 0–0 4 0
Mario Andretti '69 · 0r compared , 3 excl. 3–0 0–0 9 0
Rolf Stommelen '69 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Hans Herrmann '69 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Alex Soler-Roig '70 · 0r compared , 3 excl. 3–0 0–0 9 0

Compare with any driver

career records side by side · any era

Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.

Reliability & consistency

era-dependent · see explanation
58.3% DNF rate 35 in 60 starts
35.0% points-finish rate 21 in 60 starts
P1 best finish
P1 best grid
DNF rate & points-finish rate

DNF rate — "how often did they not finish?"

The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.

Points-finish rate — "how often did they score?"

The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.