ARU

Peter Arundell

1964–1966
11
Starts
0
Wins
2
Podiums
0
Poles
0
Titles
12
Points

Season by season

tap a header to sort
Season Team ENT R Win Pod Pole Pts WDC
1964 Lotus 4 4 0 2 0 11 P8
1966 Lotus 8 7 0 0 0 1 P17

Teammates, head to head

most races first
Teammate Qualifying Race Points
Jim Clark '63–'66 · 3r compared , 10 excl. → Full breakdown 1–12 0–3 12 46
Mike Hailwood '64 · 2r compared , 1 excl. → Full breakdown 3–0 2–0 11 1
Chris Amon '64 · 2r compared , 2 excl. → Full breakdown 4–0 2–0 11 2
Jo Siffert '63–'64 · 1r compared , 1 excl. → Full breakdown 1–1 1–0 4 1
Maurice Trintignant '63 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 0–1 0–0 0 0
Jim Hall '63 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Trevor Taylor '63 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 0–1 0–0 0 0
Phil Hill '63 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 0–1 0–0 0 0
Masten Gregory '63 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Peter Revson '64 · 0r compared , 3 excl. 3–0 0–0 7 0
Bernard Collomb '64 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 4 0
Innes Ireland '64 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 4 0
Mike Spence '66 · 0r compared , 8 excl. → Full breakdown 1–7 0–0 1 4
Pedro Rodríguez '66 · 0r compared , 4 excl. 1–3 0–0 1 0
Piers Courage '66 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Gerhard Mitter '66 · 0r compared , 1 excl. 1–0 0–0 0 0
Giacomo Russo '66 · 0r compared , 1 excl. → Full breakdown 1–0 0–0 0 0

Compare with any driver

career records side by side · any era

Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.

Reliability & consistency

era-dependent · see explanation
27.3% DNF rate 3 in 11 starts
36.4% points-finish rate 4 in 11 starts
P3 best finish
P4 best grid
DNF rate & points-finish rate

DNF rate — "how often did they not finish?"

The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.

Points-finish rate — "how often did they score?"

The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.