CLA

Jim Clark

1960–1968
72
Starts
25
Wins
32
Podiums
33
Poles
2
Titles
274
Points

Season by season

tap a header to sort
Season Team ENT R Win Pod Pole Pts WDC
1960 Lotus 6 6 0 1 0 8 P10
1961 Lotus 8 8 0 2 0 11 P7
1962 Lotus 9 9 3 3 6 30 P2
1963 Lotus 10 10 7 9 7 73 P1
1964 Lotus 10 10 3 3 5 32 P3
1965 Lotus 9 9 6 6 6 54 P1
1966 Lotus 9 8 1 2 2 16 P6
1967 Lotus 11 11 4 5 6 41 P3
1968 Lotus 1 1 1 1 1 9 P11

Teammates, head to head

most races first · default: both classified
Teammate Qualifying Race Points
Innes Ireland '60–'65 24–7 7–4 87 31
Mike Spence '63–'66 26–2 9–1 90 18
Trevor Taylor '61–'64 19–1 7–2 107 7
Jim Hall '60–'63 12–0 7–1 73 3
Jo Siffert '62–'64 15–0 7–0 79 1
Stirling Moss '60–'61 1–11 1–4 17 32
Masten Gregory '61–'63 12–1 4–0 54 1
Peter Arundell '63–'66 12–1 3–1 46 12
Mike Hailwood '63–'64 11–0 4–0 32 1
Richard Attwood '65 7–0 3–1 36 2
Jack Brabham '62–'63 6–0 3–0 18 3
Tony Maggs '61–'65 3–0 2–0 12 0
Maurice Trintignant '62–'63 7–0 2–0 30 0
Graham Hill '67–'68 9–3 2–0 50 21
Ron Flockhart '60 0–1 1–0 2 1
David Piper '60 2–0 0–1 2 0
John Surtees '60 2–1 0–1 4 6
Cliff Allison '61 1–0 0–1 0 0
Michael May '61 3–0 1–0 7 0
Henry Taylor '61 4–0 1–0 4 0
Ian Burgess '61 4–0 1–0 8 0
Lucien Bianchi '61–'62 4–0 1–0 13 0
Tony Marsh '61 3–0 1–0 3 0
Gerry Ashmore '61–'62 4–0 1–0 3 0
Peter Ryan '61 1–0 1–0 0 0
Olivier Gendebien '61 1–0 1–0 0 0
John Campbell-Jones '62 1–0 1–0 9 0
Jay Chamberlain '62 3–0 1–0 12 0
Roger Penske '62 1–0 1–0 9 0
Rob Schroeder '62 1–0 1–0 9 0
Bernard Collomb '63–'64 3–0 1–0 9 0
Hap Sharp '63 2–0 1–0 13 0
Chris Amon '63–'65 13–0 1–0 59 2
Brausch Niemann '63–'65 2–0 1–0 18 0
Walt Hansgen '64 2–0 0–1 0 4
Moisés Solana '64–'67 5–0 1–0 20 0
Chris Irwin '67 1–0 1–0 9 0
Alan Stacey '60 1–1 0–0 2 0
Mike Taylor '60 1–0 0–0 2 0
Willy Mairesse '61 2–0 0–0 4 0
Wolfgang Seidel '61–'62 6–0 0–0 19 0
Juan Manuel Bordeu '61 0–0 0–0 4 0
Tim Parnell '61–'63 3–0 0–0 6 0
Gaetano Starrabba '61 1–0 0–0 0 0
Lloyd Ruby '61 1–0 0–0 0 0
Nino Vaccarella '62 2–0 0–0 0 0
Dan Gurney '62 1–0 0–0 9 0
Tony Shelly '62 3–0 0–0 12 0
Heinz Schiller '62 1–0 0–0 3 0
Günther Seiffert '62 1–0 0–0 3 0
Ernesto Prinoth '62 1–0 0–0 0 0
Neville Lederle '62–'65 2–0 0–0 9 1
Ernie Pieterse '62–'65 3–0 0–0 18 0
Phil Hill '63–'66 2–0 0–0 9 0
André Pilette '63 2–0 0–0 15 0
Kurt Kuhnke '63 1–0 0–0 6 0
Rodger Ward '63 1–0 0–0 4 0
Pedro Rodríguez '63–'66 6–0 0–0 22 0
Paddy Driver '63 1–0 0–0 9 0
Peter Revson '64 6–0 0–0 21 0
Gerhard Mitter '64–'66 3–0 0–0 9 0
Clive Puzey '65 0–0 0–0 9 0
Dave Charlton '65 0–0 0–0 9 0
Brian Gubby '65 1–0 0–0 9 0
Paul Hawkins '65 1–0 0–0 9 0
Giacomo Russo '65–'66 2–0 0–0 0 0
Bob Bondurant '65 1–0 0–0 0 0
Piers Courage '66–'67 2–0 0–0 0 0
Jackie Oliver '67 1–0 0–0 0 0
Mike Fisher '67 2–0 0–0 9 0
Eppie Wietzes '67 1–0 0–0 0 0
Giancarlo Baghetti '67 1–0 0–0 4 0

Compare with any driver

career records side by side · any era

Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.

Reliability & consistency

era-dependent · see explanation
33.3% DNF rate 24 in 72 starts
55.6% points-finish rate 40 in 72 starts
P1 best finish
P1 best grid
DNF rate & points-finish rate

DNF rate — "how often did they not finish?"

The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.

Points-finish rate — "how often did they score?"

The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.