| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Siffert '63–'71 | 10–5 | 2–2 | 24 7 | → |
| Lorenzo Bandini '64–'65 | 0–3 | 1–2 | 3 7 | → |
| Jo Bonnier '67 | 4–1 | 1–1 | 12 2 | → |
| Richard Attwood '68 | 5–1 | 2–0 | 11 6 | → |
| Jackie Oliver '69–'70 | 8–8 | 2–0 | 23 2 | → |
| George Eaton '70 | 10–0 | 2–0 | 13 0 | → |
| Howden Ganley '71 | 5–0 | 2–0 | 9 0 | → |
| John Surtees '64–'69 | 1–3 | 0–1 | 1 8 | → |
| Bob Bondurant '65 | 0–1 | 1–0 | 2 0 | → |
| Piers Courage '66–'68 | 10–2 | 1–0 | 18 4 | → |
| John Love '67 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 9 6 | → |
| Jochen Rindt '67 | 1–6 | 0–1 | 14 3 | → |
| Guy Ligier '67 | 2–0 | 1–0 | 1 0 | → |
| Alan Rees '67 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 2 0 | → |
| Jim Clark '63–'66 | 0–6 | 0–0 | 0 22 | → |
| Jim Hall '63 | 1–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Rodger Ward '63 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Trevor Taylor '63 | 0–2 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Hap Sharp '63 | 1–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Chris Amon '63–'69 | 0–2 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Ludovico Scarfiotti '65 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Mike Spence '66–'68 | 3–2 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Peter Arundell '66 | 3–1 | 0–0 | 0 1 | → |
| Gerhard Mitter '66 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Silvio Moser '67 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 2 0 | → |
| Bobby Unser '68 | 2–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Frank Gardner '68 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Ernesto Brambilla '69 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 1 0 | |
| Peter Westbury '70 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 6 0 |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.