| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phil Hill '59–'60 | 2–5 | 1–2 | 8 18 | → |
| Graham Hill '58 | 5–3 | 1–1 | 3 0 | → |
| Ivor Bueb '58 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Jean Behra '59 | 0–2 | 0–1 | 0 2 | → |
| Dan Gurney '59 | 1–1 | 0–1 | 2 9 | → |
| Olivier Gendebien '59 | 0–1 | 1–0 | 2 0 | → |
| Wolfgang von Trips '59–'60 | 0–3 | 1–0 | 6 2 | → |
| José Froilán González '60 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 6 0 | → |
| Stirling Moss '61 | 0–1 | 0–1 | 0 9 | → |
| Jim Clark '61 | 0–1 | 1–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Alan Stacey '58 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Carroll Shelby '58 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Jo Bonnier '58 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Maria Teresa de Filippis '58 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Tony Brooks '59 | 1–4 | 0–0 | 2 19 | → |
| Richie Ginther '60 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 1 | |
| Michael May '61 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Innes Ireland '61 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Henry Taylor '61 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Lucien Bianchi '61 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Willy Mairesse '61 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Tony Marsh '61 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Wolfgang Seidel '61 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Ian Burgess '61 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.