HIL

Graham Hill

1958–1975
176
Starts
14
Wins
36
Podiums
13
Poles
2
Titles
289
Points

Season by season

tap a header to sort
Season Team ENT R Win Pod Pole Pts WDC
1958 Lotus 9 9 0 0 0 0
1959 Lotus 7 7 0 0 0 0
1960 BRM 8 8 0 1 0 4 P15
1961 BRM 8 8 0 0 0 3 P15
1962 BRM 9 9 4 6 1 52 P1
1963 BRM 10 10 2 5 2 29 P2
1964 BRM 10 10 2 5 1 41 P2
1965 BRM 10 10 2 6 4 47 P2
1966 BRM 9 9 0 3 0 17 P5
1967 Lotus 11 11 0 2 3 15 P7
1968 Lotus 12 12 3 6 2 48 P1
1969 Lotus 10 10 1 2 0 19 P7
1970 Lotus 12 11 0 0 0 7 P13
1971 Brabham 11 11 0 0 0 2 P21
1972 Brabham 12 12 0 0 0 4 P15
1973 Shadow 12 12 0 0 0 0
1974 Lola 15 15 0 0 0 1 P18
1975 Lola 3 2 0 0 0 0
Hill 1 0 0 0 0 0

Teammates, head to head

most races first · default: both classified
Teammate Qualifying Race Points
Richie Ginther '62–'64 28–1 13–5 122 67
Jackie Stewart '65–'66 11–7 5–5 64 48
Jo Siffert '68–'69 15–6 7–2 61 27
Jackie Oliver '67–'73 13–10 3–3 33 10
Jochen Rindt '69–'70 0–18 1–5 17 67
Rolf Stommelen '69–'75 2–6 4–1 3 0
Wilson Fittipaldi '72 6–4 1–3 3 0
Guy Edwards '74 7–3 4–0 1 0
Maurice Trintignant '63–'64 6–0 2–1 27 2
Giancarlo Baghetti '64–'67 7–0 3–0 17 0
John Miles '69–'70 7–6 1–2 8 2
George Follmer '73 5–7 2–1 0 4
Cliff Allison '58 3–5 1–1 0 3
Tony Brooks '61 7–1 1–1 3 6
Lorenzo Bandini '63 2–1 2–0 4 2
Masten Gregory '65 4–0 2–0 20 0
Bob Bondurant '66 5–0 2–0 11 3
Jim Clark '67–'68 3–9 0–2 21 50
Tim Schenken '71 5–5 0–2 2 5
Carlos Reutemann '72 1–9 1–1 4 3
Alan Stacey '58–'59 2–0 0–1 0 0
Innes Ireland '59–'66 7–0 0–1 0 3
Jo Bonnier '60–'69 7–3 0–1 7 4
Bruce Johnstone '62 1–0 1–0 9 0
Moisés Solana '63–'68 4–0 1–0 18 0
Tony Maggs '64 5–0 1–0 17 4
Richard Attwood '64–'69 2–0 1–0 15 3
Lucien Bianchi '65 1–0 1–0 2 0
Roberto Bussinello '65 2–0 1–0 12 0
Mike Fisher '67 2–0 1–0 3 0
John Love '69–'70 2–0 1–0 7 0
Dave Charlton '70–'71 0–2 1–0 1 0
Emerson Fittipaldi '70 2–3 1–0 1 12
Ivor Bueb '58 0–1 0–0 0 0
Bruce Halford '59 1–0 0–0 0 0
Pete Lovely '59–'70 7–0 0–0 1 0
David Piper '59 1–0 0–0 0 0
Dennis Taylor '59 1–0 0–0 0 0
Dan Gurney '60 5–2 0–0 4 0
Jackie Lewis '62 1–0 0–0 1 0
Willy Mairesse '65 1–0 0–0 2 0
Giorgio Bassi '65 1–0 0–0 6 0
Vic Wilson '66 1–0 0–0 0 0
Piers Courage '67 1–0 0–0 0 0
Chris Irwin '67 1–0 0–0 0 0
Eppie Wietzes '67 1–0 0–0 3 0
Mario Andretti '68–'69 3–2 0–0 15 0
Bill Brack '68 1–0 0–0 3 0
Hans Herrmann '69 1–0 0–0 3 0
Alex Soler-Roig '70 3–0 0–0 3 0
Reine Wisell '70 1–1 0–0 0 4
Jackie Pretorius '71 1–0 0–0 0 0
Chris Craft '71 2–0 0–0 0 0
William Ferguson '72 1–0 0–0 1 0
Brian Redman '73 0–1 0–0 0 0
Peter Gethin '74 0–1 0–0 0 0

Compare with any driver

career records side by side · any era

Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.

Reliability & consistency

era-dependent · see explanation
42.0% DNF rate 74 in 176 starts
33.5% points-finish rate 59 in 176 starts
P1 best finish
P1 best grid
DNF rate & points-finish rate

DNF rate — "how often did they not finish?"

The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.

Points-finish rate — "how often did they score?"

The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.