| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Ascari '51–'52 | 1–9 | 1–6 | 23 69.5 | → |
| Rudi Fischer '51–'52 | 8–0 | 5–1 | 36 10 | → |
| Nino Farina '50–'55 | 0–9 | 1–4 | 31 36 | → |
| Luigi Villoresi '51–'56 | 0–7 | 0–3 | 10 14 | → |
| José Froilán González '51–'54 | 0–4 | 0–3 | 4 19 | → |
| Juan Manuel Fangio '50–'55 | 0–4 | 0–2 | 9 15 | → |
| Peter Hirt '52 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 19 0 | → |
| Louis Rosier '52–'56 | 5–1 | 2–0 | 13 0 | → |
| Maurice Trintignant '52–'56 | 2–2 | 0–2 | 9 12 | → |
| Peter Whitehead '51–'52 | 4–0 | 1–0 | 14 0 | → |
| André Simon '52–'56 | 3–0 | 0–1 | 9 0 | → |
| Franco Comotti '52 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 4 0 | → |
| Roy Salvadori '52 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 6 0 | → |
| Roger Laurent '52 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 3 0 | → |
| Mike Hawthorn '54 | 0–2 | 0–1 | 0 3 | → |
| Robert Manzon '54 | 0–1 | 1–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Stirling Moss '55–'56 | 0–4 | 0–1 | 9 11 | → |
| Karl Kling '55 | 0–2 | 0–1 | 9 4 | → |
| Luigi Fagioli '50 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 4 | → |
| Consalvo Sanesi '50 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Chico Landi '51 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 2 0 | → |
| Charles de Tornaco '52 | 2–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Piero Carini '52 | 2–0 | 0–0 | 7 0 | → |
| Rudolf Schoeller '52 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 3 0 | → |
| Hans Stuck '52 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | |
| Paul Frère '55 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 3 | → |
| Harry Schell '55–'56 | 2–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Jean Behra '56 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 4 | → |
| Cesare Perdisa '56 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 1 | → |
| Paco Godia '56 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.