| Teammate | Qualifying | Race | Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harry Schell '54–'59 | 0–6 | 1–2 | 0 7 | → |
| Jack Fairman '56 | 0–1 | 1–0 | 4 2 | → |
| Jo Bonnier '58–'59 | 0–6 | 0–1 | 0 3 | → |
| Jim Clark '60 | 1–0 | 0–1 | 1 2 | → |
| Innes Ireland '60 | 0–1 | 1–0 | 1 0 | → |
| Onofre Marimón '54 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 4.1 | → |
| Roberto Mieres '54 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Ken Wharton '54 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Stirling Moss '54–'59 | 0–2 | 0–0 | 0 7.6 | → |
| Roy Salvadori '54–'60 | 1–2 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Birabongse Bhanudej '54 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Luigi Villoresi '54 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Alberto Ascari '54 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0 0.1 | → |
| Tony Brooks '56–'60 | 0–2 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Mike Hawthorn '56 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Les Leston '56 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 4 0 | → |
| Herbert MacKay-Fraser '57 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Maurice Trintignant '58–'60 | 0–2 | 0–0 | 0 8 | → |
| Jack Brabham '58–'60 | 0–2 | 0–0 | 0 6 | → |
| Jean Behra '58 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| David Piper '60 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 1 0 | |
| Bruce McLaren '60 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 4 | → |
| Phil Hill '60 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 1 | → |
| Wolfgang von Trips '60 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Pete Lovely '60 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Olivier Gendebien '60 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Henry Taylor '60 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
| Ian Burgess '60 | 1–0 | 0–0 | 0 0 | → |
Teammate Head-to-Head (above) covers same-car seasons only. Compare reaches across any era — pick any driver.
The share of race starts that ended without a classified finish. Formula: races not finished ÷ race starts × 100. Races the driver did not start are excluded from both sides. A disqualification counts as a finish that scored nothing, not a DNF. Why it sits apart from the era-fair rates: unlike a win or a podium, finishing meant something very different in different eras. Cars in the 1950s–70s broke constantly; modern cars almost always reach the flag. A high DNF rate in 1955 says far more about the machinery than the driver. Comparing two drivers within the same season is meaningful — they faced the same conditions. Across eras it's context, not a verdict.
The share of race starts that ended in a points-paying position. Formula: races finished in a scoring position ÷ race starts × 100, using that season's real points system. Why it's era-dependent: the number of positions that pay points has changed repeatedly — the top five scored in 1950, the top ten score today. A modern driver has roughly twice as many scoring positions available for the same relative performance, so a higher percentage doesn't necessarily mean a better driver. Like DNF rate, it's shown as context.